Religion without God

Resumen del libro

In his last book, Ronald Dworkin addresses timeless questions: What is religion and what is God's place in it? What are death and immortality? He joins a sense of cosmic mystery and beauty to the claim that value is objective, independent of mind, and immanent in the world. Belief in God is one manifestation of this view, but not the only one.
In his last book, Ronald Dworkin addresses questions that men and women have asked through the ages: What is religion and what is God's place in it? What is death and what is immortality? Based on the 2011 Einstein Lectures, Religion without God is inspired by remarks Einstein made that if religion consists of awe toward mysteries which "manifest themselves in the highest wisdom and the most radiant beauty, and which our dull faculties can comprehend only in the most primitive forms," then, he, Einstein, was a religious person.

Dworkin joins Einstein's sense of cosmic mystery and beauty to the claim that value is objective, independent of mind, and immanent in the world. He rejects the metaphysics of naturalism--that nothing is real except what can be studied by the natural sciences. Belief in God is one manifestation of this deeper worldview, but not the only one. The conviction that God underwrites value presupposes a prior commitment to the independent reality of that value--a commitment that is available to nonbelievers as well. So theists share a commitment with some atheists that is more fundamental than what divides them. Freedom of religion should flow not from a respect for belief in God but from the right to ethical independence.

Dworkin hoped that this short book would contribute to rational conversation and the softening of religious fear and hatred. Religion without God is the work of a humanist who recognized both the possibilities and limitations of humanity.

Biografía del autor

Ronald Dworkin (Estados Unidos, 1931 x{0026} x02013; Inglaterra, 2013) fue uno de los más influyentes teóricos del derecho del siglo XX. Su discusión con los positivistas sobre la naturaleza del derecho estableció las coordenadas dentro de las cuales se sigue discutiendo aún hoy. A su entender el derecho, es decir, los estándares que debe tener en cuenta un juez al decidir un caso, está compuesto no sólo por un conjunto de reglas identificadas en razón de su origen sino también por los principios de moralidad política que la historia institucional (las decisiones legislativas o judiciales pasadas, la costumbre, etc.) presupone a través de su justificación. En tanto que cuál sea la identificación correcta de los principios morales contenidos en la historia institucional es una cuestión controvertida, la tarea del jurista se vuelve esencialmente interpretativa, argumentativa.